Cartoon murals removed from children’s asylum center, Robert Jenrick involved

Murals featuring beloved cartoon characters such as Mickey Mouse and Baloo from The Jungle Book, which were painstakingly painted on the walls of a reception center in Kent, UK, designed to provide a warm and welcoming atmosphere for unaccompanied child asylum seekers arriving in the country, have recently been removed under the directive of the immigration minister, Robert Jenrick. This decision has ignited a contentious debate, as it’s been argued that the removal of these murals stems from concerns that they may be excessively inviting and consequently send an unintended message to potential asylum seekers.

The reception center, known as the Kent intake unit (KIU), serves as a temporary home for young asylum seekers who have embarked on perilous journeys, some of whom are as young as nine years old. The facility was equipped with these colorful murals to alleviate the distress of these vulnerable children and create a more nurturing environment. However, Jenrick’s decision to paint over these murals in April has sparked outrage and disbelief among the staff at the center, who were staunch supporters of the murals and their positive impact.

The controversy has further escalated as critics view this move as emblematic of a wider governmental stance on immigration and asylum. The shadow immigration minister, Stephen Kinnock, criticized the decision, dismissing the notion that erasing murals and removing sources of entertainment for these children will effectively deter dangerous crossings or address the root causes of the issue. Kinnock’s perspective aligns with those who see this as a superficial response to a complex and deeply entrenched problem.

Charlotte Khan, a representative from the refugee charity Care4Calais, aptly highlighted the irony in the situation by suggesting that if the sight of Mickey Mouse is deemed too welcoming by ministers, then the next question becomes what alternatives they might offer to traumatized asylum-seeking children – characters like Maleficent, Ursula, or even Cruella de Vil? This pointed commentary underscores the perceived insensitivity of the government’s decision.

While the Home Office has refrained from directly addressing staff opposition to Jenrick’s instruction, it has emphasized its commitment to ensuring the safety and security of children seeking asylum. The government’s stance remains centered on the priority to deter illegal crossings and disrupt the activities of human smugglers. This is seen as an effort to tackle the issue at its root, although critics contend that this approach fails to address the multifaceted factors driving migration and displacement.

Notably, the Kent intake unit (KIU) has been subject to inspection and evaluation by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons, which included visits to the KIU alongside neighboring facilities. While there have been improvements at the reception centers since previous inspections, certain shortcomings persist, including inadequate access to legal representation and challenges in managing medical isolation.

In light of these developments, the debate surrounding the removal of the murals underscores broader conversations about immigration policies, the treatment of vulnerable populations, and the effectiveness of deterrence-based approaches. The removal of the murals, once meant to symbolize a compassionate and welcoming approach, now stands as a point of contention emblematic of a complex and polarizing issue.

We bring out some of the most well-known Disney  collection, all of which are available at reasonable costs. Visit our link now if you are interested in the Disney collection

Baloo, Bagheera, King Louie, Mowgli, Pinocchio